BCH Split: What Coins Emerged After the Fork?127

Introduction

The cryptocurrency landscape has witnessed numerous forks over the years, each leading to the creation of new coins with distinct characteristics. One notable fork was that of Bitcoin Cash (BCH) in November 2018, which resulted in the emergence of two new coins: Bitcoin SV (BSV) and Bitcoin ABC (BCHABC).

Bitcoin SV (BSV)

Bitcoin SV, championed by Craig Wright, aimed to restore Bitcoin to its original vision as a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. It increased the block size limit to 128MB, allowing for faster transaction processing and lower fees. BSV proponents believed that this would enhance the coin's scalability and make it more suitable for everyday transactions.

Bitcoin ABC (BCHABC)

Bitcoin ABC, developed by the Bitcoin Cash Foundation, represented the more conservative approach. It maintained the 32MB block size limit, focusing on stability and compatibility with mainstream Bitcoin infrastructure. BCHABC aimed to be a reliable and secure cryptocurrency for everyday use.

Post-Split Market Performance

Following the fork, both BSV and BCHABC experienced significant price volatility. BSV initially surged in value, reaching a market capitalization of over $5 billion. However, its price subsequently declined due to controversies surrounding its development and the lack of widespread adoption.

BCHABC, on the other hand, maintained a relatively stable price trajectory. It became more popular among merchants and users who valued its compatibility with existing Bitcoin infrastructure and its focus on practical usage.

Technical Differences

Beyond the block size limit, several other technical differences emerged between BSV and BCHABC.
Miners: BSV employs a larger and more decentralized mining pool, while BCHABC has a smaller pool with more centralized control.
Consensus Algorithm: BSV uses a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm, while BCHABC implements a Modified Proof-of-Work (ModPoW) algorithm that aims to be more ASIC-resistant.
Transaction Scripting: BSV supports complex transaction scripting that allows for the creation of custom applications, while BCHABC has simpler scripting capabilities.

Community and Adoption

The BCH community remains divided between those who support BSV and those who advocate for BCHABC. Both coins have their dedicated developer teams and user bases.

In terms of adoption, BCHABC has gained wider acceptance and is listed on more exchanges and supported by more merchants. BSV has faced some challenges in gaining mainstream adoption, but it has a growing following among supporters of its vision for a large-scale electronic cash system.

Conclusion

The BCH fork resulted in the creation of two distinct coins: Bitcoin SV (BSV) and Bitcoin ABC (BCHABC). While BSV aimed for increased scalability and adherence to the original Bitcoin vision, BCHABC prioritized stability and compatibility. Both coins have their own technical differences, communities, and adoption levels.

The cryptocurrency market continues to evolve rapidly, and the long-term success of BSV and BCHABC will depend on their ability to address market demands and gain widespread adoption. The future holds uncertainties, but the BCH fork remains a significant event in the history of cryptocurrency.

2025-02-04

Previous：Will Polkadot (DOT) Surge in Value?

Next：Where to Spot Whales in the Bitcoin Market